Turn four messy contractor bids into an apples-to-apples comparison with Claude
- Posted
- by burnto (Hacker News)
- Last checked
- Method:
- How we verify
Evidence: Described by posterThe person describes what happened in words, without screenshots or video.
Outcome
A Hacker News commenter had four home-repair bids with wildly different line items, costs, timelines, scopes and formats. Claude (Opus) turned them into an apples-to-apples comparison, filled gaps with reasonable inferences from the other bids, produced a PDF they printed to go through with their partner, and suggested key questions for follow-up calls. The commenter says it clearly showed the advantages of one of the bids.
Agent
Prompt Recreated prompt
The source didn't share its exact prompt, so we wrote this from what it describes.
Run this task now, exactly as written below. Everything you need is here, so start straight away and only stop if something required is missing or a rule below tells you to. Goal: Put these contractor bids side by side so I can compare them fairly and pick one. Fill in before running: - The bids (PDFs or photos): [BIDS] - The job and any must-haves: [JOB] - My budget and timing: [BUDGET AND DATES] You're not my accountant or financial adviser. Show your working, label estimates as estimates, and tell me which points a professional or the official source should confirm. Rules: - Map every line item into the same categories (materials, labour, permits, clean-up, warranty). - Where a bid leaves something out, mark it as missing and give an estimate based on the others, clearly labelled as an estimate. - Compare price, scope, timeline and warranty, and flag anything unusually high, low or vague. - List questions to ask each contractor before I decide. - Check facts that can change (prices, opening hours, dates, availability, rules) against the official source, and tell me anything you couldn't verify. Output: A comparison table, a short summary of each bid's strengths and gaps, and a question list per contractor, as a printable PDF. You'll know it worked when: I can choose a contractor knowing exactly what each price includes.
Customize this prompt
Answer these questions and we'll put your answers into the prompt for you. You can leave any of them empty.
e.g. 50 dollars
Your prompt
Run this task now, exactly as written below. Everything you need is here, so start straight away and only stop if something required is missing or a rule below tells you to. Goal: Put these contractor bids side by side so I can compare them fairly and pick one. Fill in before running: - The bids (PDFs or photos): [BIDS] - The job and any must-haves: [JOB] - My budget and timing: [BUDGET AND DATES] You're not my accountant or financial adviser. Show your working, label estimates as estimates, and tell me which points a professional or the official source should confirm. Rules: - Map every line item into the same categories (materials, labour, permits, clean-up, warranty). - Where a bid leaves something out, mark it as missing and give an estimate based on the others, clearly labelled as an estimate. - Compare price, scope, timeline and warranty, and flag anything unusually high, low or vague. - List questions to ask each contractor before I decide. - Check facts that can change (prices, opening hours, dates, availability, rules) against the official source, and tell me anything you couldn't verify. Output: A comparison table, a short summary of each bid's strengths and gaps, and a question list per contractor, as a printable PDF. You'll know it worked when: I can choose a contractor knowing exactly what each price includes.
Scroll to see the whole prompt. Your answers show in green.
3 blanks are still empty: The bids (PDFs or photos); The job and any must-haves; My budget and timing. They'll stay in brackets in your prompt, so the chat tool may ask you about them.
What you type stays in this browser tab. We don't send it or save it, and it's gone when you leave the page. If you use a "Try this in" button, your answers go to that tool as part of the prompt.
Try this in:
This prompt has blanks to fill in, like [BIDS]. We'll copy it instead of filling it in, so you can edit it before you send.
The source used Claude. These are general chat tools, so results may differ.
Opens in a new tab. We don't see what you send.
These links are only a shortcut. We're not affiliated with OpenAI, Google or xAI, and your results may not match the source.
Optional stronger version
Our rewrite with extra checks. The poster didn't test it.
Run this task now, exactly as written below. Everything you need is here, so start straight away and only stop if something required is missing or a rule below tells you to. Goal: Put these contractor bids side by side so I can compare them fairly and pick one. Fill in before running: - The bids (PDFs or photos): [BIDS] - The job and any must-haves: [JOB] - My budget and timing: [BUDGET AND DATES] You're not my accountant or financial adviser. Show your working, label estimates as estimates, and tell me which points a professional or the official source should confirm. Rules: - Map every line item into the same categories (materials, labour, permits, clean-up, warranty). - Where a bid leaves something out, mark it as missing and give an estimate based on the others, clearly labelled as an estimate. - Compare price, scope, timeline and warranty, and flag anything unusually high, low or vague. - List questions to ask each contractor before I decide. - Check facts that can change (prices, opening hours, dates, availability, rules) against the official source, and tell me anything you couldn't verify. - Never treat an estimated gap as the contractor's real price; tell me to get it confirmed in writing. Output: A comparison table, a short summary of each bid's strengths and gaps, and a question list per contractor, as a printable PDF. You'll know it worked when: I can choose a contractor knowing exactly what each price includes. Before you finish: re-read my goal and constraints, check your answer against each one, and list anything you assumed or couldn't confirm.
Source
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48434979
Related cases
- Compare two contractor quotes for a driveway and retaining wall with ChatGPT and catch the missing drainageEvidence: Described by posterPartialBeginner-friendly
Jeffrey Trull had two quotes for a driveway extension and retaining wall worth a few thousand dollars, from contractors they'd never used. One was $500 cheaper. They fed both into ChatGPT, which took 5 minutes. It flagged that the cheaper quote didn't mention drainage or backfill, and explained that water building up behind a retaining wall can make it fail; the dearer quote included a full drainage system with stone backfill. It also set out the trade-off between the nicer interlocking blocks and basic cement blocks, and wrote follow-up questions for each contractor, since one quote gave no wall dimensions and the other didn't explain ground prep. Trull planned to take those questions back to both contractors, and to ask the cheaper one to add drainage and backfill, before signing anything.
ChatGPT · Personal · Source date:
- Compare five homeowner's insurance quotes with ChatGPT and Claude, and learn to check insurers' financial ratings, not BBBRecreated promptEvidence: Described by poster
Natasha Hsi got five homeowner's insurance quotes for a complicated house. They differed on exclusions, wind and named-storm deductibles, and admitted versus surplus-lines insurers, and Hsi found them hard to follow. They fed all five plus their current renewal into ChatGPT and Claude and ran scenarios such as a hurricane loss and a total loss. When Hsi suggested starting with BBB ratings, both pushed back: BBB tracks complaints, while financial strength ratings show whether an insurer can pay after a storm. Hsi took the questions back to their original agent, who returned a better-structured quote at a more reasonable cost with none of the weakly rated insurers.
ChatGPT, Claude · Personal · Source date:
- Push the vet to run a test for FIP after Claude kept flagging it from a sick rescue cat's resultsRecreated promptEvidence: Described by poster
thobes and their spouse took in a scared stray cat found in Elysian Park on July 4th. Weeks later the cat stopped eating and declined fast; after-hours ER care in LA cost $7,500 for two days of life support before any diagnosis, and treatment moved to a clinic in Tijuana. thobes ran each batch of test results through Claude, which kept saying to look into FIP and to push the vet to test the stomach fluid for it, though the first vet waved it off. When the Tijuana clinic was asked for the extra FIP test they first refused ('AI is not a vet'), then agreed. It came back positive, the cat got a prescription and is expected to live. thobes says not to trust medical decisions to AI entirely.
Claude · Personal · Source date: